Support Our Cause

Enter Amount:

Newsletter Subscription






Visitors Stats

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday86
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday101
mod_vvisit_counterThis week86
mod_vvisit_counterThis month563
mod_vvisit_counterAll34039

Who's Online

Evaluating China's demands towards ExxonMobil and BP PDF Print E-mail

By Le Minh Phieu and Duong Danh Huy
Translated from Vietnamese by Tony Le
17 September 2008

Original article on Le Minh Phieu's Blog:

Article published on BBC


 

Despite China’s strong protest, ExxonMobil will continue to collaborate with Vietnam to explore oil in the Eastern Sea. And even though the United States declares that it does not lean to any one side in the Paracel-Spratly dispute, the US Ambassador and the Deputy Secretary of State, in his recent visit to Vietnam, affirmed that the areas in which ExxonMobil is collaborating with Vietnam rightfully belonged under Vietnam’s sovereignty. These actions are not without reason. Vietnam has enough legal basis to assert sovereignty over the Tu Chinh – Vung May and the Nam Con Son Basin areas, while China’s dispute over these areas are completely without basis.

 

Undisputable sovereignty of Vietnam according to international law
 
Many people mistakenly believe that the protests by China to the oil exploration efforts in the above areas involve the dispute of sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Nonetheless, according to international law, even if the Paracel and Spratly Islands legally belonged to China, it remains that the Tu Chinh – Vung May and Con Son Basin areas lying to the north of the Indonesian border belong under Vietnam’s sovereignty.

According to Article 57 and 76 of UNCLOS, countries bordering the sea are entitled to an Exclusive Economic Zone stretching a maximum of 200 nautical miles from the basesline and the continental shelf; if the geological situation on the ocean floor allows, then this zone may be extended to a maximum of 350 nautical miles, or 100 nautical miles from a depth of 2500 meters.

UNCLOS also stipulates that in the case of dispute, in which there is an overlap of the EEZ between two countries, then this dispute must be resolved equitably (Article 74 and 83).

When judging maritime disputes, the International Court of Justice usually draws a line in the middle of the two countries as a test. After that, the Court determines whether the territory awarded to each party is proportional to the length of the disputed shoreline or not.

In drawing the EEZ and continental shelf, maritime law does not take into consideration small islands far from the mainland, as well as those that cannot support human settlement and an independent economic life. This principle is stated in Item 3 of Article 121 of UNCLOS, and has been applied in cases including the North Sea, Lybia vs. Malta, the Gulf of Maine, and Guinea vs. Guinea-Bisseau.

One can see that the entire Tu Chinh – Vung May and Nam Con Son Basin to the north of the Indonesian and Malaysian border lie completely in Vietnam’s 200- nautical mile EEZ or in Vietnam’s continental shelf (See Map 2). Therefore, based on Article 57 and 76 of UNCLOS, these areas naturally belong to Vietnam.

Except for China, the countries of Malaysia, Philippines and Indonesia do not have disputes with Vietnam in the areas of Tu Chinh – Vung May and Nam Con Son Basin. Brunei has a dispute over a small section of the Tu Chinh – Vung May area, but does not involve lots 133 and 134. Therefore, these Southeast Asian countries, while involved in the Spratly dispute, still respect UNCLOS and do not wish to violate Vietnam’s EEZ or continental shelf.

 

China’s notorious demands
 
In 1992, China signed a contract with Crestone to explore oil in the Tu Chinh – Vung May area. In 1994, China protested Vietnam’s contract with Mobil to explore oil in the Thanh Long area. In 2007, China pressured BP to stop its activities in the two regions of Moc Tinh and Hai Thach. (The areas of Thanh Long, Moc Tinh, Hai Thach lie in the Nam Con Son Basin).

This year, China tried to pressure ExxonMobil to cease its contract with Vietnam to explore oil in the Nam Con Son Basin.

Nevertheless, judged from international law, these demands are completely without basis.

All the islands in the Spratly archipelago are below 0.5 square km in area, and in themselves cannot support human settlement and independent economic life. According to cited legal principles, these islands are not entitled to EEZ and continental shelf. They are only entitled to a maximum territorial sea of 12 nautical miles (Article 121, Item 2 and 3 of UNCLOS).

Map 3 indicates that the 12-nautical mile territorial sea of all the Spratly islands lie outside the Tu Chinh – Vung May and Nam Con Son Basin areas. Therefore, the sovereignty dispute over the Spratly Islands does not give China the legal rights to dispute this area.

Moreover, this area lies on Vietnam’s side of the half-way line between the Vietnam shoreline and the islands in the Spratlys that lie above water during high tide (Map 3). Picture 1 also indicates that this area lies on Vietnam’s continental shelf, and does not involve the Spratlys’ continental shelf whatsoever.

******

In order to protect Vietnam’s territorial integrity, it is imperative that Vietnam needs to have a strong control and implementation of sovereignty over the Tu Chinh – Vung May and Nam Con Son Basin areas. If China successfully invades this area, it will set a dangerous precedence for all other areas that lie within Vietnam’s 200 EEZ in the Eastern Sea.

Moreover, there should be no confusion between maritime areas that clearly belong to Vietnam, including the above mentioned areas, and the Paracel – Spratly dispute. China cannot take advantage of the Paracel – Spratly dispute as an excuse to invade these areas of Vietnam, as well as claiming 75% of the Eastern Sea.
 

Map 1: Tu Chinh – Vung May and Nam Con Son Basin.

Thanh Long Area lies in lot 05-1B. Moc Tinh area lies in lot 05-3. Hai Thanh area lies in lot 05-2. Lan Tay, Lan Do areas lie in lot 06-1. The black dotted line is the “cow tongue” line drawn by China.

 ban do 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Map 2: Vietnam’s 200 Exclusive Economic Zone

Note: The black circles represent 12-nautical mile territorial sea belonging to the islands of the Paracels and Spratlys. “The cow tongue” line drawn by China goes deep into the 200 nautical mile EEZ from Vietnam’s shoreline. Based on the map of PetroVietnam.

bando 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Map 3: Tu Chinh – Vung May areas lie outside the 12 nautical miles of the islands of the Spratly archipelago.

The Thanh Long, Moc Tinh, Hai Thanh, Lan Tay, Lan Do areas lie to the Vietnam’s side of the line between Vietnam and the Spratlys.

bando 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Picture 1: The contintental shelf of the Nam Con Son Basin belong to Vietnam’s Continental shelf, unrelated to that of the Spratlys.

hinh 1

Comments
Add New RSS
Tony   |09-18-2008 14:53:59
The only reason China protests these things is because for some unfathomable reason, China believes that all these waters are Chinese "historic" waters. And that is the reason for the "cow tongue" line. But China has never defined the exact coordinates of the cow tongue, nor is this line based on any known international or martime law. Even now, China has refused to back off from this peculiar claim. But instead, continues to make claims that have no basis in any legal principles.
Tony   |09-18-2008 17:33:07
I would like to receive some feedback from the Chinese friends on what they think of this case.
mao   |09-19-2008 07:35:06
This case is very similar to China East Sea conflict with Japan. China is drilling on China East Sea much closer to china and it's sitting on the China continental shelf. Japan claimed CHina is sucking up all the oil from their side. Its very similarly, Japan's claim extends far away from their islands and practically comes up to China's doorstep.

As of now, China and Japan try to work it out and doing a 50-50 joint deal.

So, I expect some of the field of Nam con son basin extend well into the chinese claim line to joint 50-50 sharing between Vietnam and China just like China and Japan case in East China Sea.
mao   |09-19-2008 07:45:35
What's fair and not fair in this world?
After WWII, US gave Japan control a chain of island, Ryukyu islands. China had much stronger historical claim on those islands than Japan. So, After robbing their shares in the East CHina Sea by Japan and US, CHina then went South CHina Sea, to make it up ,make a stronger claim on that area based on their history.

So, this would tell what's fair and what's not fair in reality in real life.
That's just life.

After so many yrs CHina do not sleep on wwhat's the past, it try find other ways to work it out.
mao   |09-19-2008 08:05:59
Sure, China is power today, but it was weak before. Had not the Japanese imperialism robbed away so many resources from China on the East China Sea before, I doubt CHina will this demanding on South China Sea. objectively speaking. In a way, you should blame part of that on Japan.
ailien   |09-19-2008 11:09:01
What happen between China and Japan has nothing to do with Vietnam, in this case.
loco   |09-19-2008 11:10:22
Mao,

if you got bitten by a dog, are you going home and bit your neighbor's dog? That would be fun seeing you biting your neighbor's dog, and then you blame the dog that bit you. ha ha
mao   |09-19-2008 13:34:36
Just want to show you there's really no so called international court to settle this kind of things.

Or else it will drag a whole bunch of people into the mess, Vietnam versus China, CHina versus Japan, Native Amercians versus US government...on and on.

You have to look at context of the world. You can't forget everything else and just focus on those south china sea islands.
mao   |09-19-2008 13:39:07
ALso to show the scheme of making CHina look like the only imperialist country around is hypocritical and ridiculous.
Mao   |09-19-2008 13:41:21
I mean alot of Cambodians too wants Vietnam return of their lands.
banananut   |09-20-2008 21:23:50
You mean a lot of Vietnamese want China to return their land and sea, that were taken away from them illegally. Stop trying to distort the facts. Stop blaming other countries (Japan, Cambodia) for your unlawful behaviors.

It's so ironic that other leading countries continue to develop new modern technologies, exploring the universe, and producing greener world; whereas a want-to-be leading country China still smuggles other people's land and invests heavily in defense military. So much for searching oil, yet it can even develop a good reliable car.
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.23 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
< Prev   Next >